Author(s): Predrag PAVLIĆEVIĆ
Publication name: Romanian Intelligence Studies Review
Publisher name: Mihai Viteazul National Intelligence Academy
Publication type: Journal article
Publication date: June 30, 2020
Pagination:
Issue/ Volume: 23/2020
DOI:
Abstract:
The paper starts from a definition of terrorism which is widely accepted and
frequently used in scientific publications in Serbia, due to its compatibility and accuracy.
The paper also explores the reasons for adopting such a definition of counterterrorism
(CT), which encompasses a wide spectrum of countermeasures, normative frameworks
and institutional architectures. In order to fundament the scientific discourse, the
concept of risk was examined, as well as indications about an essential element of risk,
i.e. the negative consequences for the entity. In the definition of risk, as one of its key
elements, the vulnerability of entities is emphasized, which includes their resistance or,
to put it differently, their ability to carry out adequate responses. This aspect is
highlighted as it confirms the goal of the model of analysing the concept of
counterterrorism, but also the deepest basis for the construction of the CT concept.
Additionally, some components of the new intelligence paradigms are also highlighted,
which may be of relevance for the research of the CT concepts. The paper concludes that
the adaptability of the normative and institutional framework is the main objectives of
the CT constructions. Adaptability also pertains to action plans and measures to the
current threats and must include timely determination of the directions and instruments
for action, as well as the establishment of solutions that involve the anticipation of future
risks. It has been previously highlighted that the goal of CT is to achieve the coordination
of the strategic, tactical, and operational level of activity and provide an innovative,
creative and proactive perspective. The key direction in the field of CT is not only to
achieve efficiency, but to be effective as well.
Keywords: risk, terrorism, intelligence, antiterrorism, institutions.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic License.